| |
Site Navigation
Main
News
Forums
Games
Games Database
Top 100
Release List
Support Files
Features
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
Diaries
Misc
Download
Gallery
Music
Screenshots
Videos
Miscellaneous
Staff Members
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
| What are you using? |
|
|
| Total Votes : 22 |
anime
Village Dweller
Joined: 19 Apr 2002
Posts: 7
|
| What Processor are you Using ? |
|
--This is my first poll, so bare with me--
Intel vs AMD
What is better for Microsoft's DS
_________________
To battle with me is Worthless. |
Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:05 am |
|
|
vaticide
Put food in here
Joined: 21 Feb 2002
Posts: 1122
Location: One step behind a toddler bent on destruction. |
I usually buy Intel, but I won an AMD Processor, so.... that is what I use.
-v |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:27 am |
|
|
Llama
High Emperor
Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 509
Location: Earth |
AMD only, much faster. |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:05 pm |
|
|
Freakie
The Noble Demon
Joined: 10 Mar 2002
Posts: 1008
Location: Korhinis, Upper Quarters. |
I have a Intel, AMD is a little faster with game's but Intel is more faster with other stuf 
_________________
Gothic Credits
Gothic II Credits |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 1:03 pm |
|
|
Danicek
The Old One
Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 5922
Location: Czech Republic |
AMD only.
However I do not think there will be much difference in DS. Ofcourse you must compare 1800+ (AMD) with 1800 Intel. |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 1:15 pm |
|
|
TheSmJ
Village Dweller
Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 15
|
AMD Duron (900 OCed to 1050 using pencil trick, of corse)
This processor was deffinatly the best bang for my buck! |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 7:34 pm |
|
|
Rawis
Gorthaur
Joined: 01 Apr 2002
Posts: 1861
|
AMD forever!  |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 9:19 pm |
|
|
Arms Of Dirt
Village Dweller
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 21
|
I have 6 PC's in my apartment... all networked together with a switched 100Mb network... One of which is my Win2K server with 2 NIC's (one for the internet, one for the intranet) Not a single Intel processor in the house... All are AMD's... With one 1.3 Ghz T-Bird... a couple of Durons... and a couple of the older K-7's... (800 and 900 Mhz)...
I've not supported the 'Evil Empire' (aka, Intel) since AMD made their chips available... I've always gotten more performance, for less $$$...
Remember... more 'GHZ' or 'MHZ" does NOT translate into a faster, more effecient processor... as Intel discovered when the AMD 1800 + chips were beating their faster clocked (but less effecient) Pentium 4's.
Intel currently holds the cup regarding overall clock speed for desktop PC's... but that's only because AMD has been able to keep up with them in terms of overall work, by using their 'older' technology... and lower clocks... Sort of the equivalent of having a V6 outperform a larger, but less effiecient, V8...
That will change soon... as AMD's next line of CPU's is due to hit the market... They will do more 'work' at a given clock speed than the fastest Intel can offer... Which has been AMD's crowning glory... and why you see that most of the people (by a large margin) who have responded to this forum, are using AMD's... Cheaper, Better, Faster never held more true...
Arms Of Dirt |
|
Tue Apr 23, 2002 10:08 pm |
|
|
EmperorRob
Village Dweller
Joined: 19 Apr 2002
Posts: 13
|
So long as I can buy an equal- or better-performing chip from AMD at $200 less than Intel's, you can bet I'll be buying AMD. |
|
Wed Apr 24, 2002 1:49 am |
|
|
Danicek
The Old One
Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 5922
Location: Czech Republic |
quote:
Originally posted by EmperorRob
So long as I can buy an equal- or better-performing chip from AMD at $200 less than Intel's, you can bet I'll be buying AMD.
Difference is not so big anymore, isnt it? |
|
Wed Apr 24, 2002 6:48 am |
|
|
Arms Of Dirt
Village Dweller
Joined: 26 Dec 2001
Posts: 21
|
Latest PriceWatch pricing shows the AMD 1800+ at $102 US... The Pentium 2.0 Ghz...(arguably the same performance) at $319.... Still about $200 different... Which I'd rather pocket than spend on the Evil Empire...  That's alot of games... or groceries...
(For reference, the XP 2000 is $173... still cheaper by a pretty wide margin, even for those who don't see the similarities in performance between the P4 2000, and the AMD 1800+ )
Arms Of Dirt |
|
Wed Apr 24, 2002 2:38 pm |
|
|
Danicek
The Old One
Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 5922
Location: Czech Republic |
Ok, ok . |
|
Wed Apr 24, 2002 2:40 pm |
|
|
EverythingXen
Arch-villain
Joined: 01 Feb 2002
Posts: 4342
|
heh. go to tomshardware.com and look for a video on overheating comparing AMD vs Intel. It's fun.
Suffice to say, AMD chips burn hot and have no shutdown safety protocols. The video is a blast at pointing that out.
_________________
Estuans interius, Ira vehementi
"The old world dies and with it the old ways. We will rebuild it as it should be, MUST be... Immortal!"
=Member of the Nonflamers Guild=
=Worshipper of the Written Word= |
|
Wed Apr 24, 2002 2:42 pm |
|
|
Danicek
The Old One
Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 5922
Location: Czech Republic |
Well, I think we should stop this. It is starting to be too off topic and I really do not want another well known "AMD vs. Intel" flamewar. I know it from several other forums and it is ussually not nice thing to read. |
|
Wed Apr 24, 2002 2:47 pm |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
