| |
Site Navigation
Main
News
Forums
Games
Games Database
Top 100
Release List
Support Files
Features
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
Diaries
Misc
Download
Gallery
Music
Screenshots
Videos
Miscellaneous
Staff Members
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
Hexmaster
Noble Knight
Joined: 17 Jan 2002
Posts: 206
Location: Bristol, England |
At last, A (worthy) BG forum,
Like most of you, I have played the entire series and addons.
I find the whole atmosphere and story line so compelling. Music is great also.
I have played them all through at least twice each and choosing the character alignment bit causes a dilemma.
An RPG (no arguments please) is a game in which you can play a role of a character (!?). Right?
Now I find personally that I tend to go for the goody-twoshoes-paladin types, because (boringly), I can associate with that.
However, I feel that what I should be doing is going for chaotic evil and sod everyone else. In other words play a role that is unlike me and get more out of it.So, I have started again.
No fighter. Sorceror this time.
True Good etc ? No, Chaotic evil.
In BG2, how did the people get on that sided with Bodhi ?
Does the story etc; change that much ?
Regards,
Hexmaster |
Wed Feb 13, 2002 8:12 am |
|
|
Danicek
The Old One
Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 5922
Location: Czech Republic |
I just started again - BG2 + Throne of Bhaal.
This game is really good though I was not able to finish it first time a played it several months ago (it was my first RPG, I played FPS only before that).
So I will now try it again. With help of this forum, it will be probably possible and little bit easier.
I play this RPGs (like Gothic, Wiz8 but also Diablo I a II) always with mages. I like it. So I started with mage-human chaotic good character. |
|
Wed Feb 13, 2002 8:43 am |
|
|
Roach
SBR Belfry Bat
Joined: 20 Jan 2002
Posts: 3233
|
I always thought I the most like a neutral good ranger. Hmm maybe we should start a new thread about this. |
|
Wed Feb 13, 2002 9:24 am |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
