RPGDot Network    
   

 
 
Return to Krondor
Display full image
Pic of the moment
More
pics from the gallery
 
 
Site Navigation

Main
   News
   Forums

Games
   Games Database
   Top 100
   Release List
   Support Files

Features
   Reviews
   Previews
   Interviews
   Editorials
   Diaries
   Misc

Download
   Gallery
   Music
   Screenshots
   Videos

Miscellaneous
   Staff Members
   Privacy Statement

FAQ
Members
Usergroups
Will machines take over the world?
  View previous topic :: View next topic
RPGDot Forums > Absolutely Off Topic

Author Thread
Sem
Solid as a Rock
Solid as a Rock




Joined: 01 Mar 2004
Posts: 3386
Location: at the Dot
   

Pretty...

...Long
_________________
"Who are we to call this planet Earth, when it's clearly Ocean."
-- News Editor of GothicDot --
-- Moderator of the RPGDot Shadows --
Post Tue May 11, 2004 5:45 pm
 View user's profile
Ammon777
Warrior for Heaven
Warrior for Heaven




Joined: 20 Apr 2002
Posts: 2011
Location: United States
   

yeah, i can get long-winded sometimes about the subject.
Post Tue May 11, 2004 6:26 pm
 View user's profile
Darrius Cole
Most Exalted Highlord
Most Exalted Highlord




Joined: 04 May 2004
Posts: 406
Will machines take over the world?
   

No, they will not.

I define intelligence as
1. Being able to make decisions of your own free will.
2. Being able to change your way of thinking and behavior to adjust for some reality you previously had absolutely no awareness of.

I defing life as
1. Having an inate desire to preserve one's own individual life and taking action to preserve one's life if one is able.
2. Wanting to make new life like one's own self.

There are several reasons why machines will not rule humans.
Most obviously, as many of you have said; there is no clear reason why machines would try to rule humans if machines were intelligent. Humans and machines do not require the same resources to live. There would be no reason to compete. There would be every reason to cooperate. In fact, the only conceivable computer program/machine that would be hell-bent on ruling humans is one that is created to do that. No matter how many scenarios it has been prepared to handle, such machine would not be intelligent because it would be unable to deviate from its own programming.

Second, If machines/programs were intelligent, the humans would not be their biggest threat, obsolecence would be. Anything that was intelligent (Both humans and already existing programs) could make new NEW AND SUPERIOR intelligent programs. Our trillions of intelligent programs would not have time to rule us. They would have to stop and try to prevent the flood of new programs that threaten their own existence. One could say that would give programs motive to control humans, but programs trying to rule other programs would be a bigger threat to them. Their true enemy would be learning and advancing technology.

No group that despises learning could ever defeat humankind.
Post Tue May 11, 2004 6:33 pm
 View user's profile
Scribelus
Eager Tradesman
Eager Tradesman




Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 46
   

I think Socrates had the point of view that evil was a sign of ignorance.
Post Wed May 12, 2004 12:30 pm
 View user's profile
Ammon777
Warrior for Heaven
Warrior for Heaven




Joined: 20 Apr 2002
Posts: 2011
Location: United States
   

Technology is neutral. Thats what my professor said.
Post Thu May 13, 2004 2:11 am
 View user's profile
Korplem
Swashbuckler
Swashbuckler




Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Posts: 853
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI
   

quote:
Originally posted by Ammon777

Machine intelligence may or may not happen. But its due to happen anytime according to some computer scientists. It all depends on which side of reality is the truth. If we have souls that contain the two constituents of physical body with spiritual essence, then you have to admit that God exists and that machine intelligence will never happen because you cant endow machines with a soul, sorry. Not even Star Trek episodes or Star Wars movies can give allowance to that. The spirit and the machine simply do not co-exist.


I didn't read all of that post but I'd like to comment on that part.

I don't think you need a soul to be intelligent. Like Darrius said, there is a difference between intelligence and life.
_________________
If soot stains your tunic, dye it black. This is vengeance.

-The Prince of Nothing
Post Thu May 13, 2004 3:23 am
 View user's profile
Ammon777
Warrior for Heaven
Warrior for Heaven




Joined: 20 Apr 2002
Posts: 2011
Location: United States
   

I meant human intelligence that was conscious.
Post Thu May 13, 2004 4:41 am
 View user's profile
Scribelus
Eager Tradesman
Eager Tradesman




Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 46
   

American philosopher Daniel Dennett is interesting on this issue.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0316180661/qid=1084447485/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-1876755-8884719?v=glance&s=books

I also recommend "Godel Escher Bach" by Douglas Hoftstader. The view is that consciousness is the result of a certain kind of complexity (strange loops).
Post Thu May 13, 2004 12:26 pm
 View user's profile


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:04 pm



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
 
 
 
All original content of this site is copyrighted by RPGWatch. Copying or reproducing of any part of this site is strictly prohibited. Taking anything from this site without authorisation will be considered stealing and we'll be forced to visit you and jump on your legs until you give it back.