| |
Site Navigation
Main
News
Forums
Games
Games Database
Top 100
Release List
Support Files
Features
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
Diaries
Misc
Download
Gallery
Music
Screenshots
Videos
Miscellaneous
Staff Members
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
iplaygames2
Master of The Realms
Joined: 06 Sep 2001
Posts: 745
Location: Chicago, IL, USA |
Wow..I'm right at recommended..
PIII 1Ghz
256 mgs Ram
32 MbGeforce2Gts...
WinME.... 
Maybe I can play at the bare bones level... Then turn on everything in four years when I get a new rig.. 
_________________
Member of the "Fantastic ONE"
(hell, everyone else is a member of something..)
|
Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:16 pm |
|
|
bigkabuto
High Emperor
Joined: 14 Sep 2001
Posts: 591
Location: Holland/Groningen |
quote:
On 2002-04-12 13:12, Incindium wrote:
Bigkabuto, you definatly fall above the recommended requirements and from what i've heard you should be able to play it smoothly at 1024x768 but maybe have to tweak the fogging and shadows adjustments a bit. But then agian they've had time to improve performance since the Beta was release to the press, so maybe you could run it with settings cranked at 1024x768..
----
What are the system requirements for the PC version?
MINIMUM SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS: Windows ME/98 128 MB RAM; Windows XP/2000 256 MB RAM; 500 MHz Intel Pentium III, Celeron, or AMD Athlon processor; 8x CD/DVD-ROM Drive; 1 GB free hard disk space; Windows swapfile; DirectX 8.1 (included); 32MB Direct3D Compatible video card and DirectX 8.1 compatible driver; DirectX 8.1 compatible sound card; Keyboard; Mouse
RECOMMENDED: 800 MHz or faster Intel Pentium III or AMD Athlon processor; 256 MB RAM; NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS, or ATI Radeon 7500 or faster video card.
[ This Message was edited by: Incindium on 2002-04-12 13:12 ]
That's good to hear 
but still how is it possible that gothic doesn't run as smooth as it should be?
could it be that Gothic doesn't fully support the geforce3 and Morrowind really DOES support it completely? and of course that MW is using a entire different engine... still strange ..someone i know from my msn , he's a beta tester...has a AMDxp with i believe 512 ram...especially when he approached the waters the game began to show slight stutters...so i heard from him...because of that i kinda started to worry... |
|
Sat Apr 13, 2002 12:20 am |
|
|
Chekote
Where’s my Banana?!?!
Joined: 08 Mar 2002
Posts: 1540
Location: Dont know, looks kind of green |
Damn, I dont know why your (bigkabuto) system wouldnt run Gothic smooth. I have a laptop with a 1Ghz processor, and I only have a GeForce2Go (Not even a full blown GeForce2) and I run the game at 1600x1024 silky smooth.
You should see if you can optimize your system some cuz that sure doesnt sound normal. |
|
Sat Apr 13, 2002 1:52 am |
|
|
Guest
Guest
|
Usually when a game is fluttery on an ample system, its because you have all the little visual eye candy on. I don't think some people realize that a game usually looks almost exactly the same with some of the memory hoggs turned off or at least toned down. Dynamic shadows? Please...im satisfied with my character walking on a black dot the whole time. At least then i get a tolerable frame rate.
Oh yeah...on the min specs for MW, why is it that you can run MW on ME/98 with 128mb ram, but it takes 256 with XP/2000? I run bare miniumum for alot of games (ME, 128mb ram, Nivida Vanta tnt2 32mb or something like that....ughhh), but will having ME/128 allow the game to run as smoothly as with 2000/256? I just wanna get all my ram issues cleared up before the release, after that, all ill wanna do is play.  |
|
Thu Apr 18, 2002 3:35 am |
|
|
The Hulk
Avenger, Defender
Joined: 19 Feb 2002
Posts: 728
Location: Southeast U.S.A. |
quote:
Originally posted by Guest
Usually when a game is fluttery on an ample system, its because you have all the little visual eye candy on. I don't think some people realize that a game usually looks almost exactly the same with some of the memory hoggs turned off or at least toned down. Dynamic shadows? Please...im satisfied with my character walking on a black dot the whole time. At least then i get a tolerable frame rate.
Oh yeah...on the min specs for MW, why is it that you can run MW on ME/98 with 128mb ram, but it takes 256 with XP/2000? I run bare miniumum for alot of games (ME, 128mb ram, Nivida Vanta tnt2 32mb or something like that....ughhh), but will having ME/128 allow the game to run as smoothly as with 2000/256? I just wanna get all my ram issues cleared up before the release, after that, all ill wanna do is play.
The reason that Morrowind requires more ram to run on windows2000 or xp is because these operating systems require more memory to run well than Win98 or ME.
_________________
"Mr. Magee, don't make me angry. You wouldn't like me when I'm angry."
-Bruce Banner
=Member of the Non-Flamers Guild= |
|
Thu Apr 18, 2002 3:58 am |
|
|
Guest
Guest
|
Thanks. I figured it was something like that, but i just wanted to know for sure. |
|
Thu Apr 18, 2002 10:42 pm |
|
|
Lord_Arthur
Village Dweller
Joined: 27 Mar 2002
Posts: 3
|
My computer has a 800 mhz and AMD Durion GeForce MX 400 384mb ram and in my game Gothic I run it all the way full on everything the resoultion all the way full and it runs like a charm |
|
Fri Apr 19, 2002 1:04 am |
|
|
Davey
Guest
|
 i hav a duron 800 248 ram 3Dprophet 4000xt and i wanna get morrowind will this be enough....and i got a bit of money saved up so wat should i use the money for eg. Ram CPU video card |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:40 am |
|
|
Death
Village Leader
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 78
Location: Orlando,FL USA |
Hey I just got interested in this game recently. I want to know if my specs are cool with Morrowind since it sounds like a game that's hard to tame. 
My specs are:
1.2 Ghz AMD Athlon (with 384 kb on chip cache memory)
256 SD-Rams
Xtasy GeForce 4 MX 4200 (64mb)
Creative SoundBlaster Live! X-Gamer
Windows ME
I normally like to have my games at full settings (since I get few if any slow downs) I wouldn't mind having some minor slowdowns too see "Eye Candy" ofcourse I don't want a very detailed Slide Show.
So I want to know if my PC can handle all of the settings. And I would also like to know what I have to risk to have a decent Frames Per Sec.
I know that non of you know the real min. and recom. Specs but an estimate is ok with me.
Thanks in advanced! |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 3:17 am |
|
|
Danicek
The Old One
Joined: 15 Dec 2001
Posts: 5922
Location: Czech Republic |
Well, GForce4 MX 4200 card is not really good one (when they tested it it was with around GForce2 Ti) and 256 SDRam is slow and not enough. |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 6:42 am |
|
|
sauron38
Rara Avis
Joined: 14 Jan 2002
Posts: 4396
Location: Winnipeg's Sanctum Sanctorum |
Will a GeForce 4 Ti 4600 compensate for my 256 Mb of ram?
_________________
Make good choices. |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 9:36 pm |
|
|
Chekote
Where’s my Banana?!?!
Joined: 08 Mar 2002
Posts: 1540
Location: Dont know, looks kind of green |
Graphics card cannot compensate for RAM, it only takes burden from the CPU. Hell RAM is so cheap go down your sofa and youll probably find enough cash for 5Gig. |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 9:39 pm |
|
|
sauron38
Rara Avis
Joined: 14 Jan 2002
Posts: 4396
Location: Winnipeg's Sanctum Sanctorum |
No, not for the P4 users, a RamBus upgrade totalling 256 MB is almost the same as getting a Ti 4400.
_________________
Make good choices. |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 9:44 pm |
|
|
Chekote
Where’s my Banana?!?!
Joined: 08 Mar 2002
Posts: 1540
Location: Dont know, looks kind of green |
What card do you have now? |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 9:48 pm |
|
|
sauron38
Rara Avis
Joined: 14 Jan 2002
Posts: 4396
Location: Winnipeg's Sanctum Sanctorum |
I have 4x64 Mb Ramchips and a Geforce 2 Ultra (64 mb).
_________________
Make good choices. |
|
Thu Apr 25, 2002 9:51 pm |
|
|
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Wed Apr 10, 2019 3:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
