| |
Site Navigation
Main
News
Forums
Games
Games Database
Top 100
Release List
Support Files
Features
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
Diaries
Misc
Download
Gallery
Music
Screenshots
Videos
Miscellaneous
Staff Members
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
toby
Village Dweller
Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 11
|
| Iraq: Flunking the Combat Test? |
|
Two weeks ago, with good-to-go freshly stamped on the soldiers' foreheads, the 2nd Battalion from the recently rebuilt Iraqi army (IAF) was tasked with assisting our hard-pressed Marines in Fallujah. As the convoy, accompanied by a U.S. Marine advisory team, was rolling toward the sound of gunfire, it was ambushed in the outskirts of Baghdad -- where it flunked its baptismal test of fire.
It was then that the soldiers of the 2nd Battalion put to lie all the "they're combat-ready" affirmations from Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, their U.S. Army trainer, and Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the U.S. ground commander in Iraq.
Upon the battalion's graduation from training, Sanchez had proclaimed: "We are now into the accelerated period of providing Iraqi security forces, and these soldiers look very proud, very dedicated. I have high expectations that in fact they would help us bring security and stability back to the country."
An eyewitness to the action, who asked to remain anonymous, says: "Gen. Sanchez's expectations tanked, because as soon as the convoy was hit, some IAF soldiers simply took off. The convoy got stalled when one of the IAF soldiers driving one of the trucks simply jumped out and ran, leaving the truck running. This truck struck a civilian vehicle, creating a jam that prevented part of the convoy from moving."
"About 30 IAF soldiers were lost in this ambush," reports my source. "Some simply ran away, some sold their AK-47s and donned civilian clothes, and some had civilian clothes under their uniforms, so they simply took off their uniforms and ran."
The Iraqi officers commanding this unit were as useless as a bayonet on a cannon. The battalion commanding officer and all of the company COs involved have since been relieved, and more than 100 soldiers were initially tossed into the slammer. And the Marine team that saved the unit from certain destruction? It's doubtful that these brave warriors will receive any recognition whatsoever, since Gen. Eaton and his politically-driven masters are quickly and quietly moving the earth to disappear this embarrassment.
Once the battalion came under the virtual command of the Marines, the remaining Iraqi soldiers got their act together enough to extricate themselves from contact with the guerrillas and returned to their training base at Tadji with their tails between their legs - only to be told they were being immediately airlifted to Fallujah. When they refused to go, the quitters were subsequently disarmed and jailed in a makeshift prison on the former Republican Guard base.
By the end of the day, this 695-man battalion had eight wounded, 24 combat desertions, 104 mutineers, 78 AWOLs and 170 on leave.
And our warriors have added some new slang phrases to the unofficial Book of Military Phrases and Terms. When you ask a Marine who was there what happened to the 2nd Battalion, he'll tell you that the unit "went ARVN on us" - referring to the many South Vietnamese Army (ARVN) units that were world-class bug-out artists. There's also another new one for the military lexicon: Deserters are now called "Uas" - Unauthorized Absence From Combat. Or, as we called it way back when, "Cowardice in the face of the enemy."
Hopefully, instead of coming up with still more spin, Gen. Eaton will learn from this debacle, look truth dead in the face and recognize that no amount of magic-wand-waving will change an Iraqi mob into an instant effective army.
Sure, the key to pulling our military out of Iraq is to transfer all security operations to the Iraqi forces. But since it usually takes at least 10 years to build an army, that exercise is easier said than done. The answer, of course, is leadership - not Madison Avenue-type hype - coupled with "more sweat" training similar to the tough curriculum that converted the South Korean army from rabble into an elite force.
Both Gens. Sanchez and Eaton need to eyeball The Art of War and infuse the new Iraqi army's leaders with the five constant factors of war: Moral Law; Heaven; Earth; The Commanders; Methods and Discipline.
It?s never too late to learn from Sun Tzu's 2,500-year-old time-tested rules that have been used down through the ages to forge countless scores of great fighting outfits. |
Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:29 am |
|
|
Hexy
High Emperor
Joined: 28 Jun 2002
Posts: 621
|
Wait, wait, wait.
Iraqis DON'T want to help occupiers against their own? Much like the vietnameese?
There's an Iraqi opposition??
This about as obvious as the so called "rules" throughout Sun Tzu's Art Of War.
"If you know your self, but not your enemy, that's not so good. If you know your enemy and not yourself, that's better! And hey, if you know your enemy AND your self, then that's REALLY good!"
NO WAY, who wudda thunk it?
The US is going to have a tough time, if possible at all, to train a loyal army while the population is increasingly angered by their presence. |
|
Sat Apr 24, 2004 5:39 am |
|
|
EverythingXen
Arch-villain
Joined: 01 Feb 2002
Posts: 4342
|
The US has lost this war. They lost it the day it was begun. A sizeable portion of the people of Iraq were not ready for it and the US walked into a PR deathtrap. The people will cheer as much in June when the US returns control to them as much as they cheered when Saddam was deposed.. and that is a loss of the first order. If the US soldiers aren't pulled out by the end of July after turning over control... expect one of the most brutal insurgent attacks in the history of man.
This is no matter of technological superiority: The US army can kick anyone's butt in the world. This is a matter of sending troops into a region of the world that hates America. It cannot win against that mentality and no amount of soldier deaths will change it. If anything the more Americans that die the greater the resentment grows: Not only are Americans still hanging around they're not doing a good job of it.
Without the backing of the people a 'liberation' cannot succeed. This is no invasion, where dissidents are rounded up and put into stockades and all weapons are confinscated and martial law is declared... where anyone who breaks the rules is shot on sight. The US cannot do this without becoming what they despise. Bush is not Napolean, or Hitler, or Alexander, any of the Ceasar, or anyone else who conquered large chunks of the world with military might. The US is not Nazi Germany, nor the Roman Empire ... super-patriots willing to do whatever was neccessary, no matter how heinous the act, for the glory of their homeland.
This entire thing will get written into the annuls of history as one of the greatest military blunders of all time.
_________________
Estuans interius, Ira vehementi
"The old world dies and with it the old ways. We will rebuild it as it should be, MUST be... Immortal!"
=Member of the Nonflamers Guild=
=Worshipper of the Written Word= |
|
Sat Apr 24, 2004 6:55 pm |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
