|
Site Navigation Main News Forums
Games Games Database Top 100 Release List Support Files
Features Reviews Previews Interviews Editorials Diaries Misc
Download Gallery Music Screenshots Videos
Miscellaneous Staff Members Privacy Statement
|
|
|
Did the Moon Landings happen |
Yes |
|
78% |
[ 18 ] |
No |
|
21% |
[ 5 ] |
|
Total Votes : 23 |
Finarfin
Baron of the Court
Joined: 20 Nov 2002
Posts: 345
Location: London |
MOON - has anyone been there! |
|
i was having a debate with a friend of mine about some of the conflicts of the world that are based on land or countries, and we came to the conclusion that your opinion on whether a country should own this or that piece of land is based on how far back you should go to determine the "rightful" owners of that land, the reason we disagreed we mainly becuase we loooked at the situations with different time frames.
so i was wondering how far back you think people should go to determine the rightful owners of land?
i know there are other issues that have a baring but for now i'm not interested those
EDIT: Oh and if you would like to talk about the moon landings, then be my guest!
Last edited by Finarfin on Fri May 23, 2003 10:27 am; edited 1 time in total |
Tue May 20, 2003 3:44 pm |
|
|
Toaster
Bread Alert
Joined: 27 Jan 2003
Posts: 5475
Location: Sweden |
It's very varying, both sides do naturally want to go back to different times, but I think that the less you go back the more important it is. _________________
Tabbrowser Extensions
DictionarySearch |
Tue May 20, 2003 3:53 pm |
|
|
DzD
Unknown
Joined: 12 Mar 2002
Posts: 7140
Location: Sweden |
You shouldn't go back at all. _________________ There once was a youngster, DzD
Whose avatars numbered infinity
But I must admit
His latest, a hit
Cuz the Little One's a mystery to me
Written by - dteowner |
Tue May 20, 2003 4:59 pm |
|
|
Finarfin
Baron of the Court
Joined: 20 Nov 2002
Posts: 345
Location: London |
so if norway is invaded by britain, and last month it was norwegan, but today it is british, we shouldn't go back, Hmmm sorry i can't agree to that, i don't believe in De Facto government (well i believe it exists obviously, but not that it is right) _________________ I didn't get where i am today by talking in clichés, i avoid clichés like the plague, a cliché to me is like a red rag to a bull..... |
Tue May 20, 2003 5:09 pm |
|
|
Roach
SBR Belfry Bat
Joined: 20 Jan 2002
Posts: 3233
|
I agree with DzD. Right or wrong I believe it is simply human nature, that which belongs to someone belongs to the one who holds it. |
Tue May 20, 2003 5:15 pm |
|
|
Finarfin
Baron of the Court
Joined: 20 Nov 2002
Posts: 345
Location: London |
quote:
I agree with DzD. Right or wrong I believe it is simply human nature, that which belongs to someone belongs to the one who holds it.
which means that if you CAN take it, you have a right to do so, in fact even if you can't take it, you have a right to try, therefore all wars, invasions etc etc are right.
Hmmmm frankly i think that is rubbish _________________ I didn't get where i am today by talking in clichés, i avoid clichés like the plague, a cliché to me is like a red rag to a bull..... |
Tue May 20, 2003 5:20 pm |
|
|
Roach
SBR Belfry Bat
Joined: 20 Jan 2002
Posts: 3233
|
I didn’t say it was right, I said it is human nature. |
Tue May 20, 2003 5:30 pm |
|
|
Iron Man
Dazed and Confused
Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 773
Location: Location Location |
oh well that's easy, the last treaty declaring who has ownership of that country, if there is none, then it belongs to the native people doesn't it? _________________
This box secretly turns into a picture and laughs at YOU personally when you're not looking. |
Tue May 20, 2003 5:53 pm |
|
|
DzD
Unknown
Joined: 12 Mar 2002
Posts: 7140
Location: Sweden |
Well, remember the austrian empire? They had a huge collapse when the different cultures revolted. So I was thinking more of the lines of that. That every culture and language should have their own country, and not be ruled by another country that isn't the same religion or have the same language, That is of course unless that part of the world wants to be ruled by another country. _________________ There once was a youngster, DzD
Whose avatars numbered infinity
But I must admit
His latest, a hit
Cuz the Little One's a mystery to me
Written by - dteowner |
Tue May 20, 2003 5:58 pm |
|
|
Iron Man
Dazed and Confused
Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 773
Location: Location Location |
I thought it was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand (which thecnically caused ww1) _________________
This box secretly turns into a picture and laughs at YOU personally when you're not looking. |
Tue May 20, 2003 6:12 pm |
|
|
dteowner
Shoegazer
Joined: 21 Mar 2002
Posts: 7570
Location: Third Hero of Erathia |
quote: Originally posted by Finarfin
Hmmmm frankly i think that is rubbish
Then evidently you weren't asking an honest question with your original post. You were fishing for someone to conveniently support your opinion (whatever it may be, as you have omitted that info) so you could win your argument. Sorry if we couldn't oblige. _________________ =Proud Member of the Non-Flamers Guild=
=Benevolent Dictator, X2/X3 and Morrowind/Oblivion Forums=
Sorry. No pearls of wisdom in this oyster.
RIP Red Wings How 'Bout Dem Cowboys! |
Tue May 20, 2003 10:56 pm |
|
|
Korplem
Swashbuckler
Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Posts: 853
Location: Pearl Harbor, HI |
things like this are why i try to stay away from politics
but I think that if a group of people or a country can take another group's/country's land and has the means to defend the land and the people on it, then its thiers...
but then again, im just a computer geek, what do i know? _________________ If soot stains your tunic, dye it black. This is vengeance.
-The Prince of Nothing |
Tue May 20, 2003 10:57 pm |
|
|
Dhruin
Stranger In A Strange Land
Joined: 20 May 2002
Posts: 1825
Location: Sydney, Australia |
I don't think there's an answer to this one. There's very few places in the world where you couldn't look further back in time to find different "owners". In a perfect world (which it obviously isn't) and where possible you'd decide based on the best interests of the majority of the population.
It would be nice to think that every language or culture could have self-governance but it's wishful thinking for a variety of reasons from human-nature to economic. Some countries would splinter into too many groups to be economically viable and the arguments about borders might well be worse than simply forcing a single rule.
Still, there are certainly cases of injustice or where the best interests of the people would be served by separation. |
Wed May 21, 2003 1:14 am |
|
|
Bilbo
High Emperor
Joined: 12 Mar 2002
Posts: 1620
Location: New York |
Carry it a step further - evolution. Who says humans have the right to rule the world instead of their predecessors? Virii have been around a lot longer than people, so perhaps we should just given everything to them?
Arguing time frame for something like this is arguing after the fact. You've already decided who you want to win, and you pick a time frame to support your position, not the other way around.
Dividing people by race or religion can lead to equally ludicrous results. Most countries have some diversity in their populus. In many places, such diversity co-exists peacefully. To say that all Polish people, for example, should live together in their own country is equally disingenuous - at some point, and arbitrary decision had to be made to determin who was Polish from someone who wasn't. And what about people who change citizenship or religion? _________________ The world itself shifts and changes and fades to mist like the strings of a minstrel's harp, and mayhap the dreams we forge are more enduring than the works of kings and gods.-Robert E. Howard
=Member of the RPGDot Shadows, The Nonflamers' Guild, and The Alliance of Middle Earth= |
Wed May 21, 2003 5:14 am |
|
|
Finarfin
Baron of the Court
Joined: 20 Nov 2002
Posts: 345
Location: London |
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Finarfin
Hmmmm frankly i think that is rubbish
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then evidently you weren't asking an honest question with your original post. You were fishing for someone to conveniently support your opinion (whatever it may be, as you have omitted that info) so you could win your argument. Sorry if we couldn't oblige.
*sigh*
No I wasn't, it was a perfectly straight forward question, there was no hidden agenda, i'm not asking for people to agree with me, i was trying to get some other peoples opinions from other places in the world (after a debate with my friend about the issue), and likewise i don't have to agree with them, if i think some one is wrong i can say so, i haven't slagged him off or tried belittled him, so i don't really see what your problem is.
PS. thanks for everyone else for posting without predudice _________________ I didn't get where i am today by talking in clichés, i avoid clichés like the plague, a cliché to me is like a red rag to a bull..... |
Wed May 21, 2003 10:20 am |
|
|
|
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|