RPGDot Network    
   

 
 
Dungeons & Dragons Online: Stormreach
Display full image
Pic of the moment
More
pics from the gallery
 
 
Site Navigation

Main
   News
   Forums

Games
   Games Database
   Top 100
   Release List
   Support Files

Features
   Reviews
   Previews
   Interviews
   Editorials
   Diaries
   Misc

Download
   Gallery
   Music
   Screenshots
   Videos

Miscellaneous
   Staff Members
   Privacy Statement

FAQ
Members
Usergroups
The art of reviews
  View previous topic :: View next topic
RPGDot Forums > CRPGs General

Author Thread
Seth
Last Man Standing
Last Man Standing




Joined: 23 Jan 2002
Posts: 1008
Location: Faerun
The art of reviews
   

After checking out the reviews of the games I played and I’m about to buy, I have this question: how? I mean how the reviewer decides the ratings? What are the standards s/he chose to accept? Does s/he play the whole game and then writes or just spends few hours in the beginning and assume the game is all that? What if s/he is prejudice to certain gender or developers? What if s/he is in p*** off mood?

Any of these factors can influence quite a few potential buyers. Face it, we are bias even if we really don’t want to. We get upset when our favorite game gets crappy reviews and vice versa. So how to write an honest review? Maybe we should left to some AI to decide what the final product is really like?
_________________
Money - An article which may be used as a universal passport to everywhere except heaven, and as a universal provider of everything except happiness.
Post Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:11 pm
 View user's profile
stanthony
One Smart Dog
One Smart Dog




Joined: 28 Oct 2002
Posts: 556
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Re: The art of reviews
   

quote:
Originally posted by Seth
Maybe we should left to some AI to decide what the final product is really like?


Naah... That would be the same as if we let computers decide in a courtroom who's guilty and who's not.

I guess I read *many* reviews before buying a game. As in really many. I usually surf the net for a day or two to get an impression of a game. My guesses were mostly right so far

I think the art of writing a review is that you have to a professional in the area of RPG gaming. Then you can often judge - and judge rightly - on a game after 5-10 hours of play. I used to write reviews of books, and being a professional philologist (my first education) I found that it is possible to make initial judgement after reading some 50 pages and scanning through the rest. Of course, to write a real review you need to read everything, but the first impression is almost never wrong. It depends on how many books you read / games you played before.
_________________
- Druids do not fight with metal weapons! Sit here, and you over here. Put the elbows of your right arms on the table...
- Arm-pulling? Get me back me pan!

R.A.Salvatore The Cleric Quintet. Canticle
Post Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:45 pm
 View user's profile
Dhruin
Stranger In A Strange Land
Stranger In A Strange Land




Joined: 20 May 2002
Posts: 1825
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Ah, a good question but one that doesn't have an answer. Every reviewer, good or bad, brings their tastes, experiences, bias and expectations to the table. A good reviewer can balance these issues to come to an 'objective' result (as much as that is possible in a subjective field).

I think a good review must finish the game but many don't. I agree with stanthony that you can often form a reasonable opinion after a short period of time with a game but a professional review must cover the whole game. There are many games that have a poor endgame or where the story ultimately triumphs over some poor mechanics etc and this is only revealed by looking at the whole product.

You can only look at as many reviews as possible and read between the lines for a bias or point of view that you generally either agree or disagree with. Look for good detail in the review with examples.

As a news editor, I get to read a lot of reviews - they range through the whole spectrum. Lately I've posted two dreadful examples: an apathetic review about Gothic 2 and a shockingly short Lionheart review that was little more than the promo stuff for the game with a one-sentence conclusion. In both these cases a common thread was a reviewer covering a genre they don't normally like or play. It's fair to say a really good or really bad game transcends it's genre but often a review about an RPG from a FPS player has the wrong expectations and misunderstands the issues.
Post Thu Sep 04, 2003 12:29 am
 View user's profile
corwin
On the Razorblade of Life
On the Razorblade of Life




Joined: 10 Jun 2002
Posts: 8376
Location: Australia
   

My advice for ALL reviews is very simple. Find one or two reviewers that you either trust, or normally agree with and follow their advice. I use this for books, films, and games, though usually with games I follow their development closely and pay attention in the forums. I seldom go wrong that way.
_________________
If God said it, then that settles it!

I don't use Smileys, I use Emoticons!!

Post Thu Sep 04, 2003 7:13 am
 View user's profile
methusala
Tempered Warlord
Tempered Warlord




Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 281
Location: Odinwald
   

Always play the demo if there is one and if there isen't thats a bad sign in my books.You can drive yourself nuts reading reviews and most of the time I go to the site and read the forums instead.The forums can also drive you wacky but I've found that I get a clearer picture of the game from people that have been fallowing its developement for some time.The "Golden Rule" is to wait awhile until after the game is released,then check the boards again.I know this is difficult to do for someone who has been waiting all their lives for this one game but I've found,through bitter experiance, that this will not only save you money but your hard fought for sanity as well.
Post Thu Sep 04, 2003 7:28 am
 View user's profile
Ariel
Harmonious Angel
Harmonious Angel




Joined: 21 Jul 2001
Posts: 432
Location: Germany
   

Demos, however, can also portray a false or flawed image of a game. Sure, if a demo is fun the full game usually is fun too, but if a demo is based on some old code, or has lots of important features cut, or shows off a part of the game that is not prominent in the full version, it could seem uninteresting, while the game itself might actually be much more appealing when it hits the shelves.

Other than that, I would go with corwin's advice. Pick a reviewer whose taste is similar to yours, don't listen too much to others.
_________________
“Through the sounds of falling rain, through the clouds of bitter times
I see the pure grace of your smile, in dreams of the warmth in your eyes”
- Tim North
Post Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:22 pm
 View user's profile
Myrthos
Spoiler of All Fun
Spoiler of All Fun




Joined: 07 Jul 2001
Posts: 1926
Location: Holland
   

There are no unbiased reviews. Everybody has his or her preferences. They might like or dislike the developers, they might have had a fight with the wife that very same morning or they might have had a good or bad day in the office. All things count. A good reviewer tries to shut these things out but there is no such thing as being unbiased. And everybody makes mistakes in a while.

There are different types of reviewers. Some want to play and finish the game, before writing the review. EverythingXen is one of those. This means that they are never the first to get the review out. And apparently being the first count these days.
There is a downside to only playing a part of the game. If you only play through Barcelona in Lionheart, does that give you a fair indication of the game?
That said, in some occasions a review copy is accompanied by save games, prepared by the developers that will put you in different parts of the storyline, so that for those not wanting to play the game in full they atleast have the opportunity to play most parts of it.

I don't know about sticking with one or two reviewers for all time. Everybody makes mistakes and not everybody likes all genres equaly. Which reminds me of one of the most dreaded sentences in a review in my opinion is: "I normally do not play RPGs, but...".

My advise would be to read as many reviews and points of views as possible. So what you get the game 2 weeks later then you could have. If really nobody likes it, then there must be some truth in it.
_________________
Kewl quotes:
I often have an odd sense of humor - Roach
Why quote somebody else, think of something yourself. - XeroX
...you won't have to unbookmark this site, we'll unbookmark you. - Val
Reports Myrthos for making me scared and humbled at the mere sight of his name - kayla
Post Fri Sep 05, 2003 8:15 am
 View user's profile



All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:21 am



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
 
 
 
All original content of this site is copyrighted by RPGWatch. Copying or reproducing of any part of this site is strictly prohibited. Taking anything from this site without authorisation will be considered stealing and we'll be forced to visit you and jump on your legs until you give it back.