| |
Site Navigation
Main
News
Forums
Games
Games Database
Top 100
Release List
Support Files
Features
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
Diaries
Misc
Download
Gallery
Music
Screenshots
Videos
Miscellaneous
Staff Members
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
Daedalus
High Emperor
Joined: 04 Jan 2002
Posts: 2516
Location: Estonia |
i get also 7 FPS there where the rat was |
Thu Jul 31, 2003 11:14 am |
|
|
thebiz
Village Dweller
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 14
|
I don't mean to bring you down or anything, but getting the fx5600 probably wasnt the best decision. You could have got a superior Radeon 9600 for around the same price, and been able to test the game on a totally different chipset. But oh well. FXes are supposed to have the very best image quality, and thats what you seem to like. |
|
Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:53 am |
|
|
Ragnar
High Emperor
Joined: 30 Oct 2001
Posts: 486
Location: NJ USA |
Well…I’ve gone and done it this time. In my quest to develop a system that will handle Gothic at a decent clip I have created a monster (and money pit). Started out buying two Seagate SATA 120g drives and ended up with this Mod in progress (Pic shows cooling test).
_________________
"That one hurt..."
Sylvio |
|
Thu Oct 02, 2003 6:27 pm |
|
|
RastaBlasta420
Village Leader
Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 92
Location: Canada |
That looks pretty sweet. |
|
Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:50 am |
|
|
PlanetSide
Village Dweller
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 4
|
I got a monster computer..p4 3.2, 512mb ddr, ati radeon 9800 pro, 80gb seagate sata HD and Gothic 2 runs like ass  In khorinis everything maxed, it goes as low as 17 although it averages around 23-25 i think. Seems to jerky for my taste so I actually run the city at 100% viewdistance there at least its 30+ always. Well 1 think i found is i can run 6x Antialiasing and 16x anistrophic filtering with no performance hit so the graphics card isnt the bottleneck, the cpu CANt be the bottleneck, and the HD cant be either, shouldnt be in games. I think its the ram is, ive seen people with much inferior equipment but with twice the ram almost match my framerate. Also to clarify radeons have superior performance and image quality compared to fxes and thats not coz I got a radeon thats why I got a radeon. So there are my tips for making a monster computer, get ati and lots of ram. But I doubt if anyone can make gothic run smooth (40 is smooth, 30 is borderline...) anywhere at 300% vd. Also 1 think seems to be strange that seems simlar to the problem, when i had my old computer p3 550, xabre 400, 512 ram gothic 1 seemed to run faster than that compared to my current computer :S |
|
Sun Nov 16, 2003 5:27 am |
|
|
Ragnar
High Emperor
Joined: 30 Oct 2001
Posts: 486
Location: NJ USA |
I agree…The biggest improvement I made was going to a matched set of 512s. I am hoping that the new setup will gain me some performance. I should be able to get the 2500+ Barton up to at least 2.4G. With the two Seagate 120G SATA drives setup in a RAID 0 config, there hopefully be no bottle neck in raw I/O.
If you want to take a look…http://forums.bit-tech.net/showthread.php?s=&threadid=44173&perpage=20&pagenumber=1
_________________
"That one hurt..."
Sylvio |
|
Tue Nov 18, 2003 2:30 am |
|
|
bigboy_
Keeper of the Gates
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 118
Location: Romania-Transilvania |
I had jerky performance too in Gothic2 to,but not any more...today i installed Service Pack1 and it did the trick.Everything is going smoothly,even in the country!
_________________
But one thing is certain: we shall meet again!  |
|
Tue Nov 18, 2003 6:55 pm |
|
|
Ragnar
High Emperor
Joined: 30 Oct 2001
Posts: 486
Location: NJ USA |
What are you're vid settings & fRates?
_________________
"That one hurt..."
Sylvio |
|
Tue Nov 18, 2003 10:30 pm |
|
|
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
