RPGDot Network    
   

 
 
SpellForce - The Order of Dawn
Display full image
Pic of the moment
More
pics from the gallery
 
 
Site Navigation

Main
   News
   Forums

Games
   Games Database
   Top 100
   Release List
   Support Files

Features
   Reviews
   Previews
   Interviews
   Editorials
   Diaries
   Misc

Download
   Gallery
   Music
   Screenshots
   Videos

Miscellaneous
   Staff Members
   Privacy Statement

FAQ
Members
Usergroups
overrated
  View previous topic :: View next topic
RPGDot Forums > Dungeons and Dragons General

Author Thread
HolyWarriorov
Guest






overrated
   

Will someone PLEEEEEEASE tell me what is so great about the Baldur's Gate series? I've TRIED to like it, stuck with it to halfway in the game, then I just give up. The combats are soooo tedious, the storyline is a bore, the voice acting is awful, the magic system is overloaded with worthless spells, the skill system is virtually nonexistant, and why should I play this when there is Might & Magic or Wizardry?
Post Sun Jun 16, 2002 2:50 am
 
EverythingXen
Arch-villain
Arch-villain




Joined: 01 Feb 2002
Posts: 4342
   

The simplest answer is because it's argueably the best D&D CRPG series released so far. I was fiercely dissappointed with Baldur's Gate 1... it was terrible. I don't know why I bought Baldur's Gate II... but I did, and it was so much better that I name it one of my favorites. The story was better. The character classes were better. The combat was better.

Why should you play this when you could be playing Wizardry or Might and Magic? You shouldn't. If you don't like a single thing about the series, then don't play the series. I can't stand Wizardry myself, and I've played most of them part way through. I downloaded the demo for 8 to be sure... and yep... I still don't like the Wizardry series.

Useless spells and no skills are common problems to D&D CRPGS because the pen and paper rules the games were built on are full of crap. It's my favorite RPG, but most of it is empty crap. 3rd edition fixed a lot of that to get with the times, and I'm hoping Neverwinter Nights slaughers the BG series in every way, shape, and form.
_________________
Estuans interius, Ira vehementi

"The old world dies and with it the old ways. We will rebuild it as it should be, MUST be... Immortal!"

=Member of the Nonflamers Guild=
=Worshipper of the Written Word=
Post Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:50 am
 View user's profile
stealth
Protector of the Realm
Protector of the Realm




Joined: 23 Mar 2002
Posts: 261
Location: Valhalla
   

Well, everyone has different tastes so of course Baldur’s Gate isn’t to everyone’s liking. Personally I praise the series. I can’t think of any other games I’ve spend so much time on. I wouldn’t consider myself to be the most patient man alive. If I leave a game for too long, I probably won’t get back to it since there always seems to be another thing to catch my attention. This has never been the case with the BG series.

I never really played Wizardry and M&M since I have an issue with FPV RPG’s. I tried Wiz8. Used over an hour creating my party and started the game. It got off to a bad start with a fight against giant crabs. I simply can’t stand fighting stupid critters (IMO one of the only flaws in Fallout) but I kept going on until I meet yet another bunch of critters and the game was history. (Well, the turn based combat didn’t help either)

@ EverythingXen: I didn’t think they were that different so I find it strange that you think BG1 was terrible. Well, BG2 was better in every way but I would consider the experience quite alike.
_________________
"You'll never see me coming..."
=Shadow of the RPGDot Shadows=
=Member of The Sports Fans' Club=
Post Sun Jun 16, 2002 8:43 pm
 View user's profile
EverythingXen
Arch-villain
Arch-villain




Joined: 01 Feb 2002
Posts: 4342
   

Precisely... it was better in every way. I felt BG1 was *so close* but failed... then BG2 came out and I said "Ahhh... this is what was missing."

The NPCs. They had personality in BG2. The classes and kits were more interesting. The strongholds were fun. Most importantly... DEAD SPACE was mostly eliminated. There was so much empty space in BG... an hour tramping back and forth mapping a location to have nothing in it of note. In BG2 the space was used better.

The games played entirely different for me. Also, I liked Irenicus as a villain better than Sarevok (who was the best thing about BG... but even then...).
_________________
Estuans interius, Ira vehementi

"The old world dies and with it the old ways. We will rebuild it as it should be, MUST be... Immortal!"

=Member of the Nonflamers Guild=
=Worshipper of the Written Word=
Post Mon Jun 17, 2002 3:50 am
 View user's profile



All times are GMT.
The time now is Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:20 pm



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
 
 
 
All original content of this site is copyrighted by RPGWatch. Copying or reproducing of any part of this site is strictly prohibited. Taking anything from this site without authorisation will be considered stealing and we'll be forced to visit you and jump on your legs until you give it back.