RPGDot Network    
   

 
 
Shadow of Aten
Display full image
Pic of the moment
More
pics from the gallery
 
 

Site Navigation

Main
   News
   Forums

Games
   Games Database
   Top 100
   Release List
   Support Files

Features
   Reviews
   Previews
   Interviews
   Editorials
   Diaries
   Misc

Download
   Gallery
   Music
   Screenshots
   Videos

Miscellaneous
   Staff Members
   Privacy Statement


 
Star Wars Galaxies: Infobits

(PC: MMORPG) | Posted by Moriendor @ Friday - June 29, 2001 - 14:12 -
Top
| Game Info | Rate this game | Homepage | Screenshots
Hmm... might call it their famous last words before going on vacation (see Infobits from yesterday).

1) Haden "Shug_Ninx" Blackman (Lucas Arts Producer) has commented on a fanīs post in which he (the fan) said he read an article on Yahoo stating that Hoth and Dagobah will be err.. "visitable" locations in the game world.

Shug_Ninx replied:


    Havenīt read the article that youīre discussing, but only Tatooine has been confirmed. The other two planets, while a focus of some debate, have not been announced as actual locations in Star Wars Galaxies at launch. The quote may have been taken out of context - Star Wars Galaxies will allow you to explore familiar (and not-so familiar) Star Wars planets. Weīre not ready to tell you which ones yet.

2) In the very same post the fan asked if and how Vader will be included in the game (plus a few other things).

Shug_Ninx:


    We are planning to include Darth Vader. We havenīt decided who will encounter him nor what the circumstances will be. "Jedi in training" might run afoul of Vader; they might not...

    I expect planets will evolve and change, specificially due to player interactions with the worlds (cities will spring up and grow, etc.). They will also change due to weather patterns and other stuff.

    We havenīt announced anything about the beta testing yet. If you work backwards from our Fall 2002 release date, you can probably guess that Beta testing will start sometime in 2002, though.

3) Last one for today is from Raph "Holocron" Koster (Creative Director). He comments on PvP (player vs. player), the most talked-about issue since weeks.

Holocron:


    Thereīs really three main avenues to consider here.

    1) Battlefields. This is the REAL way we draw in the non-PvP crowd, of course. Itīs a zero commitment, have fun and fight a battle, pick a side with no permanent consequence, sort of thing.

    2) Doing an action and getting some faction standing and a temporary PvP flag. This is what scares the non-PvPers, because they see "shoot a Stormtrooper, and get 10,000 hards raised against you and get ganked." But it does give us an avenue for people to acquire faction standing in the first place.

    3) The sympathizer thing, whereby you donīt get to initiate, but get aggressed against by NPCs. This is what Bajeezus was referring to as inelegant. It undeniably is. But itīs a natural consequence of #2. Otherwise you could keep doing say, Rebel actions and missions, and suffer zero consequence. We canīt forcibly make you declare...

    Now, we currently do in fact intend to reserve equipment checkout and the like to declared people only. So the bennies are still on the declared side. So that (very valid!) concern of yours is moot...


 
 
All original content of this site is copyrighted by RPGWatch. Copying or reproducing of any part of this site is strictly prohibited. Taking anything from this site without authorisation will be considered stealing and we'll be forced to visit you and jump on your legs until you give it back.