RPGDot Network    
   

 
 
Anachronox
Display full image
Pic of the moment
More
pics from the gallery
 
 
Site Navigation

Main
   News
   Forums

Games
   Games Database
   Top 100
   Release List
   Support Files

Features
   Reviews
   Previews
   Interviews
   Editorials
   Diaries
   Misc

Download
   Gallery
   Music
   Screenshots
   Videos

Miscellaneous
   Staff Members
   Privacy Statement

FAQ
Members
Usergroups
Sacred: Review @ Gamer's Pulse
  View previous topic :: View next topic
RPGDot Forums > News Comments

Author Thread
Moriendor
Black Ring Leader
Black Ring Leader




Joined: 19 Jul 2001
Posts: 1306
Location: Germany
Sacred: Review @ Gamer's Pulse
   

Gamer's Pulse has smacked up a <a href="http://www.gamerspulse.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index&req=showcontent&id=435" target="_blanK">review</a> of Ascaron's action RPG 'Sacred'. Their rating is remarkably low as compared to other scores we've seen so far - a mere 29/50.<blockquote><em>Point and click. That's all I've been wanting lately: a simple, point and click role-playing game. As the processing power of computers continue to rise exponentially, the role of point and click RPGs seems to diminish. Titles like Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic combine traditional role-playing elements with third-person action that steer away from old-school point and click games. Sacred attempts to reinvigorate point and click role-playing games, but fails to energize a genre that has seen better days and better titles.</em></blockquote>
Post Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:48 pm
 View user's profile
TheMadGamer
High Emperor
High Emperor




Joined: 03 May 2002
Posts: 487
Location: Southern California
Hmm
   

Well, I happen to love this game!
_________________
The Poster Previously Known As NeptiOfPovar
Post Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:58 pm
 View user's profile
Guest







   

Geez, while I'm not a fan of these Diablo-style games, how can this guy call some of the most beautiful 2D backgrounds ever made "deplorable"? Maybe he needs a new monitor or new lenses, that would also explain his problems with the darkness at night.
Post Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:00 pm
 
hammermd23
Eager Tradesman
Eager Tradesman




Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 48
   

Two words put this schmuck in his place: Co-op Multiplayer.

Games that have this are incredibly rare, and since this mode is the most fun, I'd play the game if it looked considerably worse (say, Darkstone graphics)...
Post Wed Apr 07, 2004 11:50 pm
 View user's profile
chrisbeddoes
Guest






   

I find that this review is accurate.I understand that other people love this game but i just not like it.

My reason for not liking it is

Bad A.I
Immersion is continiously broken with bad references.
Too repetitive combat and too many enemies. Seriously this game combat reminds me more of Lionheart than Diablo 2.

I really like the horse idea and the use of regeneration time instead of mana.


-----
Finally the world is huge but non interactive .


I have tried to like this game but i simply cannot.
Mayby if they fix the multiplayer some months later i will give it a second try.
Post Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:19 am
 
TheMadGamer
High Emperor
High Emperor




Joined: 03 May 2002
Posts: 487
Location: Southern California
   

What do you mean by:

quote:
Originally posted by chrisbeddoes
Immersion is continiously broken with bad references.


_________________
The Poster Previously Known As NeptiOfPovar
Post Thu Apr 08, 2004 4:02 pm
 View user's profile



All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:16 pm



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
 
 
 
All original content of this site is copyrighted by RPGWatch. Copying or reproducing of any part of this site is strictly prohibited. Taking anything from this site without authorisation will be considered stealing and we'll be forced to visit you and jump on your legs until you give it back.