RPGDot Network    
   

 
 
Geneforge 3
Display full image
Pic of the moment
More
pics from the gallery
 
 
Site Navigation

Main
   News
   Forums

Games
   Games Database
   Top 100
   Release List
   Support Files

Features
   Reviews
   Previews
   Interviews
   Editorials
   Diaries
   Misc

Download
   Gallery
   Music
   Screenshots
   Videos

Miscellaneous
   Staff Members
   Privacy Statement

FAQ
Members
Usergroups
Gothic 2?
  View previous topic :: View next topic
RPGDot Forums > Gothic - General

Author Thread
SteelCradle
Village Dweller
Village Dweller




Joined: 30 Jan 2002
Posts: 8
Location: Finland
   

Hi there
Do u have any idea are they planning to make gothic 2 or is it already in progress?
I would love to see another part of this fabulous game..

_________________
"Carried from the tides of time, Chromanin's visions have opened my eyes.."
Post Mon Feb 04, 2002 5:22 pm
 View user's profile
wesmjohn
Baron of the Court
Baron of the Court




Joined: 27 Dec 2001
Posts: 326
Location: Kentucky
   

Gothic 2 is in the works now. From what I've heard, we can look for it next year sometime.

Until then, I'll be waiting for it like a starving man would wait for a juicy steak...
Post Mon Feb 04, 2002 5:25 pm
 View user's profile
SteelCradle
Village Dweller
Village Dweller




Joined: 30 Jan 2002
Posts: 8
Location: Finland
   

hehee..I know the feeling.Want some more and want it reaaaally bad

_________________
"Carried from the tides of time, Chromanin's visions have opened my eyes.."
Post Mon Feb 04, 2002 5:27 pm
 View user's profile
bigkabuto
High Emperor
High Emperor




Joined: 14 Sep 2001
Posts: 591
Location: Holland/Groningen
   

I'm hoping for a 2002 release...summer 2002 sounds fine or even earlier..since the graphics engine is exactly the same as Gothic..developing time is not as much as let's say it was for PYro studios: Commandos1 to commandos2 a complete new graphics engine ...i really hope gothic2 will show up this year..
Post Mon Feb 04, 2002 9:27 pm
 View user's profile
PornCop
Head Merchant
Head Merchant




Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Posts: 51
Location: Québec
   

It's sure it will be before Warcraft III or Team Fortress 2.

_________________
Vive les patates pilées!
Post Tue Feb 05, 2002 4:38 am
 View user's profile
Ethernox
Village Dweller
Village Dweller




Joined: 06 Feb 2002
Posts: 3
   

Amen
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 12:17 pm
 View user's profile
Gorath
Mostly Harmless
Mostly Harmless




Joined: 03 Sep 2001
Posts: 6327
Location: NRW, Germany
   

Although it has no direct connection to Gothic2, maybe it´s a good point of time to revitalize the discussion about the Codecreatures engine.

English:
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q1/020206/geforce4-15.html

German:
http://www.tomshardware.de/graphic/02q1/020206/geforce4-17.html

Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 1:55 pm
 View user's profile
Kwitzak
Village Leader
Village Leader




Joined: 28 Jan 2002
Posts: 84
Location: Denmark
   

DAMM...What a Grafix..I want that CARD..hehe.

Lets not hope that Gothic 2 will be that good, cause that will mean that i got to rob a bank to get a new card..hehe

Lets hope that they use that engine for Gothic 2..hehe

[ This Message was edited by: Kwitzak on 2002-02-07 08:42 ]
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 2:19 pm
 View user's profile
mersil
Noble Knight
Noble Knight




Joined: 23 Nov 2001
Posts: 214
   

Conclusion :

GeForce 3 = is the clear winner
GeForce 4 = no Dx 8. support
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 6:19 pm
 View user's profile
Gorath
Mostly Harmless
Mostly Harmless




Joined: 03 Sep 2001
Posts: 6327
Location: NRW, Germany
   

quote:

On 2002-02-07 12:19, mersil wrote:
Conclusion :

GeForce 3 = is the clear winner
GeForce 4 = no Dx 8. support


???
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 6:29 pm
 View user's profile
soltys
Magister of the Light
Magister of the Light




Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 386
Location: Poland, Warsaw
   

not exactly:

GF4 MX is successor of GF2 MX. It has some of the GF4 TI features (lma2, accuview antialiasing), but has no programmable T&L (hardware pixel and vertex shaders). And of course GF4 MX is considered lowend card. But all GF4 TI accelerators (4200,4400,4600) have updated T&L engine (nfiniteFX 2), what means full hardware DX8.1 . Especially two parallel vertex shaders are nice. 80+ fps in Aquanox show how powerfull those cards are.
It's a pitty Nvidia hadn't included 1.4 (or 2.0) pixel shaders. Seems we have to wait for GF5 family with that.
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 8:52 pm
 View user's profile
mersil
Noble Knight
Noble Knight




Joined: 23 Nov 2001
Posts: 214
   

Clarification :
Apology:

Actually i was just reading that Link that was posted Above ( by Gorath ) and this is a Cut and paste section from the Conclusion of their review.
____________________________________________
The performance of the GeForce4 MX440 and 460 cards, however, proved to be very impressive. Especially the GeForce4 MX460, which is able to score results as high as those of the GeForce3 Ti200, or even the Ti500 cards. Both are able to beat ATi's Radeon 7500 in most cases.

Still, none of the GeForce4 MX cards has full DirectX 8.x support, because of its lack of vertex and pixel shaders. This weighs heavily when you remember the lowest priced offering out of the GeForce4 Ti bunch of cards. It's only $20 more than GeForce4 MX460.

I therefore suggest the GeForce4 MX440 for value buyers, but they should try to get the price down to less than $149. Better yet, a value buyer should watch out for GeForce3 cards. Any GeForce3 card that costs less than $190 is a bargain right now. GeForce3 comes with full DirectX 8.x functionality, vertex/pixel shaders and lots of 3D power! If you can chose between a GeForce3 card and a GeForce4 MX card for similar prices, I would clearly go for the GeForce3!

____________________________________________


after reading that article i posted a reply, here.

i got to Thinking about what that Guy said in that article. ( how can they build a card with no dx 8. support ?

so i went to Nvidia.com and read ALL the specification on ALL of the New cards..

AND : GeForce 4 Ti and , GeForce MX cards " DO" support Dx 8.1 and GeForce 4 Go, provides support for dx 8.0

Next time before i Post about someone's Review, i will Do my Own investigation
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 9:32 pm
 View user's profile
soltys
Magister of the Light
Magister of the Light




Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 386
Location: Poland, Warsaw
   

GF4 MX series are going to be rather cheap (<200$). And they only lack programmable T&L. There're still very, very few games supporting vertex and pixel shaders massively (like aquanox or dronez). Games not using these features will run smoothly on every GF4 (of course they may need more than 64 mb for additional textures). On the other side, GF4 MX 460 is more powerful than GF2 ultra, that still can handle a lot of games easily. The weakest "full" version of GF4 TI is only few bucks more expensive than strongest MX. If you need programmable T&L but don't want to spend money on shiny new GF4 TI, you can always get GF3 TI 200 (with older but still good vertex and pixel shaders).
Post Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:10 pm
 View user's profile
RingWrath
Jedi Master
Jedi Master




Joined: 08 Jan 2002
Posts: 513
Location: new zealand
   

quote:

On 2002-02-04 22:38, PornCop wrote:
It's sure it will be before Warcraft III or Team Fortress 2.




i dont think so.. ive been watching wc3 with great anticipation, they have already released the feckin beta! it should only be about 2-3 more months now.

_________________
Long is the way. And hard,
that out of hell leads up to light.

- Se7en
Post Fri Feb 08, 2002 12:24 am
 View user's profile



All times are GMT.
The time now is Tue Apr 16, 2019 6:04 pm



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
 
 
 
All original content of this site is copyrighted by RPGWatch. Copying or reproducing of any part of this site is strictly prohibited. Taking anything from this site without authorisation will be considered stealing and we'll be forced to visit you and jump on your legs until you give it back.