| |
Site Navigation
Main
News
Forums
Games
Games Database
Top 100
Release List
Support Files
Features
Reviews
Previews
Interviews
Editorials
Diaries
Misc
Download
Gallery
Music
Screenshots
Videos
Miscellaneous
Staff Members
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
Moriendor
Black Ring Leader
Joined: 19 Jul 2001
Posts: 1306
Location: Germany |
| Dungeon Siege 2: Review @ CCGR |
|
Thanks to Cheryl from Christ Centered Game Reviews for letting us know that they have finished their <a href="http://www.ccgr.org/modules.php?name=MReviews&op=show&rid=618" target="_blank">review</a> of 'Dungeon Siege II'. Final score: 70%.<blockquote><em>This game is much darker than the original. There’s lots of blood and violence (-5.5) which cannot be disabled. There’s some minor language (-2), and other races are often called names (-2.5). There’s magic which is pretty much impossible to avoid. It doesn’t have to be your character that uses the magic but it will be used on you. There is mention of ley lines, undead and restless spirits. The combat mages can use necromancy magic. (- There are incantation shrines where you can chant phrases and temporarily gain or raise powers. I’m happy to report that there are no occult symbols used in this game. Even though you’re trying to save the planet, other members are in your party purely for revenge. Finally the woman’s armor is a bight tight fitting, but at least it covers the stomach area. (-1.5)
<br>
<br>Appropriateness score 30.5/50</em></blockquote> |
Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:39 pm |
|
|
TileGrout
Guest
|
I wish more atheists reviewed games. And made bumper stickers. And came to my house recruiting.
I want to read game review quotes like this:
"Polytheists will find this game exceptionally satisfying as there are over eight deities you can claim allegience to"
"Agnostics will enjoy that the priest class is reduced to a mace-wielding name-calling fighter class with a twisted agenda."
"Players can use the power of necromancy, while silly in application, the awesome display of power is undeniable" |
|
Sun Sep 11, 2005 3:25 am |
|
|
BC
Guest
|
This was a great line:
quote:
Finally the woman’s armor is a bight tight fitting, but at least it covers the stomach area.
Now the STOMACH AREA is on the list of "naughty bits"? You might expect this next:
quote:
Finally the woman’s armor is a bight tight fitting, but at least it covers the earlobe area.
|
|
Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:52 pm |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
